November 30, 2015

Math/Mathiness: cross-references

Posts
  • Wikipedia, economics, scientific knowledge, or political agenda pushing?   here
  • Profit   here
  • Economics and Logic ― an empty set to this day   here
  • Economists cannot properly apply scientific tools   here
  • Economists are too stupid for elementary logic ― the final proof   here
  • The MMT fraud in slow motion, so that even economists can get it   here
  • The unassailable formal refutation of MMT   here
  • MMTers: too stupid for simple math   here
  • There are NO crank scientists in economics because economics is NOT a science   here
  • The problem with economics as a discipline   here
  • Lars Syll ― a particularly stupid/corrupt fake scientist   here
  • Heterodox economics ― stupidity, masochism, or disinformation?   here
  • Blowing smoke about bipartisan failure   here
  • Understanding socialism presupposes understanding profit   here
  • Ending the pluralism of provably false economic theories with the long-overdue Paradigm Shift   here
  • How Randall Wray takes the piss out of the House Budget Committee   here
  • Marx and Marxists ― too stupid for the elementary algebra of profit   here
  • Why economists always seem to lose the fight against inequality   here
  • The sectoral balances obfuscation: stupidity or corruption?   here
  • Keynes ― the poster boy for the weakness of the economist’s mind   here
  • Economics, math, pluralism, and corruption   here
  • Bill Mitchell’s dishonorable discharge from the sciences   here
  • Deficit cheerleaders ― the Oligarchy’s useful idiots   here
  • Links on Alfred Marshall   here
  • After 200+ years even economics becomes a science   here
  • The worthlessness of Value Theory   here
  • How incompetent are economic methodologists? Very!   here
  • Are economics professors really that incompetent? Yes!   here
  • Controlled demolition of MMT ― an exercise in elementary logic   here
  • Quick MMT 101 refutation   here
  • Economists’ silly kindergarten games   here
  • Economics: failure, fake, fraud   here
  • Macroeconomics: Economists are too stupid for science   here
  • Dear idiots, it is deficit spending that creates the distribution people complain about   here
  • Misrepresenting MMT   here
  • Still beyond the reach of economists: The Holy Grail of Science   here
  • “But economics is not pure mathematics or logic” No, it is pure blather   here
  • Ontological uncertainty is NOT the problem but economists’ ontological stupidity   here
  • Heterodox economics: When stupidity becomes a public danger   here
  • “I never learned maths, so I had to think” ― another False-Hero-Memorial   here
  • Economics: Math is NOT the problem, scientific incompetence is   here
  • The present non-existence of economics   here
  • Wikipedia and the promotion of economists’ idiotism (II)   here
  • Hooray! The formalization issue is finally settled   here
  • Profit and the Private-Property-Irrelevance Theorem   here
  • Deficit-spending/money-creation is ALWAYS a bad deal for WeThePeople   here
  • Rectification of MMT macro accounting   here
  • Economics, philosophy, and mathematics   here
  • Economists: just too stupid for counting   here
  • Why economists have not been effective in economics   here
  • Economics: math-adorned incoherent blather   here
  • We are not yet out of the wood; in fact, we are not yet in it   here
  • Morons on math   here
  • Note on Lars Syll on ‘Cauchy logic’ in economics   here
  • Math, Einstein, and the bottomless incompetence of economists   here
  • Economics between mathiness, dyscalculia, and idiocy   here
  • Heterodoxy’s popular but silly math denial   here
  • A new curriculum for swampies?   here
  • Wicksell’s misplaced critique of mathematics   here
  • New economic thinking ― false promises and hopes   here
  • Marshall and the Cambridge school of plain economic gibberish   here
  • The tiny little problem with economics   here
  • The great economic equations   here
  • Econ and math: Forever talking at cross purposes?   here
  • Mathiness is NOT the problem — scientific incompetence is   here
  • Coming to terms with formalization (II)  here
  • At last, mathiness problem settled   here
  • Economics, Gödel, and a would-be field day for math-Luddites  here
  • Hold the handle, not the blade  here
  • Mathiness and the Ur-blunder  here
  • Profit (not mathematics) is the key  here
  • The science that never was  here
  • Neither truth nor beauty  here
  • Rubberneck's reality  here
  • The synthesis of institution and math  here
  • The insignificance of Gödel's theorem for economics  here
  • Marshall's "Burn the mathematics": cross-references  here
  • Beauty or horseshit?  here
  • From obscurity to enlightenment  here
  • Total scientific Dadaism  here
  • Economists do not solve problems, they are the problem  here
  • The axiomatic method is impeccable  here
  • Failure: method or incompetence?  here
  • Marshall: a monument of scientific incompetence  here
  • Marshall and some skewed arguments  here
  • From Marshall to Georgescu-Roegen  here
  • What engine?  here
  • Over the cliff  here
  • Who is afraid of axioms?  here
  • Still in the woods  here
Related