#Economics#FailedScience#Economists#StupidOrCorruptOrBoth
— E.K-H (@AXECorg) February 8, 2021
Lawson’s fundamental methodological error and the failure of Heterodoxyhttps://t.co/PcoqB9Xh3B#DefundEconomics #FireEconomists #ScrapTheLot
Economics and Philosophy
“The moral of the story is simply this: it takes a new theory, and not just the destructive exposure of assumptions or the collection of new facts, to beat an old theory.” (Blaug)
- Bye, bye economic philosophers
- Dear philosophers, economics is a systems science
- Economics for philosophers
- Lawson’s fundamental methodological error and the failure of Heterodoxy
- The trouble with truth
- If religion is opium of the people, economics is crack of the people
- What’s the use of economists?
- Economics is NOT about what Happiness is but about what Profit is
- Economics, philosophy, and mathematics
- Note on Amy Willis ‘Can majoring in philosophy make you a better person?’
- The economist as moralist
- Economics: Poor philosophy, poor psychology, poor science
- How to stop idiot-breeding
- Poor philosophy, poor science, poor job
- Mental messies and loose losers
- Hijackers, agenda pushers, PsySocs and other morons
- Habermas, Albert, Robinson, Syll are right — now scrap the crap
- Economics — the fly that cannot see the glass
- Beauty or horseshit?
- Economists: scientists or political clowns?
- The indelible scientific disgrace of economics, see Ch. 13 of Sovereign Economics