Comment on Lars Syll on 'Mainstream macroeconomics distorts our understanding of economic reality'
My argument has been:
• Orthodoxy is a failure.
• Heterodoxy is a failure.
• There is no alternative to the Structural Axiomatic Paradigm.
As far as orthodox and heterodox approaches are formalized they imply I=S. The Structural Axiomatic Paradigm implies the 2-sector Profit Law as given by Wikimedia AXEC09: